11/15/2023 0 Comments Rejoin aaa for $19 in carolinasHere’s a map sourced from Business Insider whereby Stephen Schwartz suggested the following nuclear strike targets, the highest priority of which would be Minuteman ICBM bases. The first and second wave could be all over in minutes to an hour (point being – it will be fast). Strategic bombers would mop up what’s left. The primary targets will likely be military installations, while a secondary wave will broaden in scope. As a result, this may likely take down the power grid, followed by a first wave of nuclear strike. Potentially via orbiting satellites, or launched from submarines or even off-shore freighters. Some believe that a nuclear first strike will ‘first’ involve a salvo of EMP detonations at high altitude. The Russians, Chinese, N.Korea (and others?) are apparently researching and developing Nuclear EMP technology (electromagnetic pulse). The following product from MIRA Safety is one good choice… While critical systems are held up by diesel backup generators and dependence on a constant delivery of fuel to keep them running.Ĭoncerned about nuclear fallout and alpha particles? I recommend a CE / CBRN approved full face respirator mask. If the power grid (or part of the power grid) goes down during a nuclear exchange, there will additionally be a high probability that some (or many) of these plants will present a real and present danger if they cannot ‘scram’ in time. There are many nuclear power plants located across the country. While they will eventually fall out (some quicker than others), the effects could be long lasting as radiation settles upon the land. The fallout cloud will drift with the lower and upper level winds. In both circumstances, radiation (particles) will reach into the atmosphere. Though this fact is not to diminish the consequences… Therefore, this will result in less overall fallout in the atmosphere. However, it will not pulverize the soil and ground like a ground burst detonation would. It will still destroy buildings and everything on the ground from its shock-wave (within a blast radius). This will create a very dirty nuclear fallout situation. It will not only pulverize everything within a given radius, but will also pulverize many countless tons of soil and dirt into the atmosphere. The real effects surrounding the nuclear targets on any given map will depend on the type of nuclear detonation. Lets hope that none of them ever are in control of ‘the button’. Are there still such people today? Of course there are. Had they possessed nuclear weapons, they surely would have used them. History has shown that there have been psychopathic leaders. > GQ GMC-300E-Plus Digital Geiger Counter But they are still interesting to examine, especially relative to one’s own location…Ī Radiation detector / Geiger counter, certainly an asset: They might not fully represent some of the changes which have occurred since their publish. Therefore, they vary with regards to nuclear proliferation and opinion of the day. The nuclear target / fallout maps shown below are in the public domain. “…a mapped illustration of the top 30 most populated cities (and metro areas) in the United States which could potentially ‘go’ first in a nuclear war…” Although there are lots of military installations, the following military nuclear targets logically seem more likely than others to be on primary target lists.” “… a list of United States military targets likely to be hit first compared with others. (the one you’re looking at now), and the following: Note: I have several related opinion articles on ‘nuclear targets’: Although obviously wind direction could be different, depending on ‘today’s weather’. It’s based on general prevailing wind direction. Interestingly, fallout direction is also shown. Targets are based on data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and Wikipedia. (Update) I found the following nuclear targets map in the public domain from Martin Vargic of who makes info-graphics and various maps. Note: It may seem like there are more ‘red dots’ on the map than any probable nuclear attack, but believe it or not, there could potentially be more – given the many thousands of nuclear weapons in Russia (for example). Note: The three larger appearing target areas shown within Montana, North Dakota, and the corner of (Wyoming, Nebraska, and Colorado) represent known ICBM silos and nuke storage. It’s simply presented as ‘food for thought’. No doubt I’ve missed a number of them, as well as other probable strategic locations. The nuclear targets map shown above (source file) is one that I put together based on a number of factors - looking at other maps and data including military installations, nuclear weapons storage and silo locations, bases, cities, etc. Out of curiosity I searched for maps that may reveal nuclear targets in the United States, and I’ve posted them here for your interest.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |